Skip to content

Rifampin versus isoniazid for the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: Part 3 effectiveness

A randomised clinical trial comparing 4 months of rifampin to 9 months of isoniazid for the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: Part 3 effectiveness

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN05675547
Enrollment
5720
Registered
2009-05-29
Start date
2009-08-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Latent tuberculosis infection Infections and Infestations Tuberculosis

Interventions

Amended as of 12/06/2009: Rifampin (drug) and isoniazid (drug). The dosage of the medication is determined according to the weight of the subject: Isoniazid: once per d

Sponsors

The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (Canada)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Current information as of 31/08/2010: Adults (aged greater than 18 years, either sex) with documented positive tuberculin skin test (TST) (or in the absence of a TST, a documented positive Quantiferon test [QFT]) and prescribed 9INH for LTBI, following authoritative recommendations. Initial information at time of registration: Adults (aged greater than 18 years, either sex) with documented positive tuberculin skin test (TST) and prescribed 9INH for LTBI, following authoritative recommendations.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients who were contacts of TB cases known to be resistant to INH, RIF, or both (i.e. multi-drug resistant [MDR]) 2. Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals on anti-retroviral agents whose efficacy would be substantially reduced by rifampin, unless therapy can safely be changed to agents not affected by rifampin 3. Pregnant women - rifampin and INH are considered safe in pregnancy, but therapy is usually deferred until 2 - 3 months post-partum to avoid foetal risk and the potential for increased hepato-toxicity immediately post-partum 4. Patient on any medication with clinically important drug interactions with INH or RIF, which their physician believes would make either arm contra-indicated 5. History of allergy/hypersensitivity to INH or to rifampin, rifabutin or rifapentine 6. Active TB. Patients initially suspected to have active TB can be randomised once this has been excluded. 7. Persons who have already started LTBI therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the cumulative incidence during 28 months after randomisation, of confirmed active tuberculosis (TB) among all persons randomised (effectiveness, using intention to treat analysis) to 4RIF and 9INH

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Current secondary outcome measures as of 26/07/2012: 1. Compare the cumulative incidence of confirmed active TB among those who took at least 80% of doses of the LTBI treatment to which they were randomized, in less than 120% of the allowed time (i.e. efficacy). 2. Compare the cumulative incidence of probable, as well as confirmed active TB between patients randomized to the two regimens during 28 months following randomization. 3. Compare rates of Grades 3&4 adverse events during treatment between subjects randomized to the two regimens. 4. Compare health system costs, and cost-effectiveness of the two regimens, in the different sites. 5. Describe occurrence of drug resistance (to INH or RIF) among subjects who develop confirmed active TB. Previous secondary outcome measures until 26/07/2012: Compare the cumulative incidence of confirmed active TB among those who took at least 80% of doses of the LTBI treatment to which they were randomised, in less than 120% of the allowed time (i.e. efficacy)

Countries

Australia, Benin, Brazil, Canada, Ghana, Guinea, Indonesia, Korea, South, Saudi Arabia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026