Tick-borne relapsing fever (TBRF) Infections and Infestations Relapsing fevers
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: All members of families living in traditional style constructed ?tembe? houses (rectangular with a flat roof of sod or earth supported by poles and walls of mud plastered wicker or sun-dried bricks) were eligible for inclusion.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Families living in households in which floors and walls were plastered with cement and/or roofed with corrugated metal were excluded because it has long been known that they are rarely, if ever, infested with ticks
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Percentages of households infested with O. moubata s.l. (domestic infestations with the soft tick vector of TBRF), numbers of O. moubata s.l. per house (tick-density) and incidence of Borrelia infections in under five year-old children. Surveys were carried out at baseline, with five follow-ups at 3, 7, 15, 18 and 25 months post-intervention. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Using a structured questionnaire, studies on knowledge, attitudes, perceptions and behaviours with regard to the efficacy of ITNs in reducing tick infestations and tick-biting and their perceived benefits were conducted in April 2004 (14 months after the trial began) and at the end of the trial (April 2005). In the latter study, behaviours in the control households and the practice of anti-tick activities were additionally investigated in response to perceived anomalies in the data collected in the previous 12 months. | — |
Countries
Tanzania