Skip to content

A double blind randomised placebo-controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of paracervical block plus Intrauterine anesthesia and paracervical block alone for pain relief during fractional durettage

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN02384619
Enrollment
70
Registered
2005-07-08
Start date
2003-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Local anesthesia for fractional curettage Surgery Fractional curettage

Interventions

Intrauterine lidocaine plus paracervical block (experimental group) compared with intrauterine saline plus paracervical block (control group)

Sponsors

Mahidol University - Siriraj Grant for Research Development (Thailand)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women with abnormal uterine bleeding scheduled for fractional curettage.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who had the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status >II, genital organ infection, profuse uterine bleeding, a history of lidocaine hypersensitivity, a history of impaired liver function, were virgin, pregnant, or unable to understand how to score a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The reduction of a maximum pain score during fractional curettage.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes included pain profile during fractional curettage, number of patients with pain score >4 cm, patients? global satisfaction, types and incidence of adverse events, and serum lidocaine profile.

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026