Skip to content

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus conservative treatment of high energy clavicle fractures

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus conservative treatment of high energy clavicle fractures

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN00825817
Enrollment
40
Registered
2004-09-30
Start date
1999-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning: Fractures Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning Clavicle fractures

Interventions

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus conservative treatment

Sponsors

Department of Health
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients with high energy clavicle fractures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Not provided at time of registration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Using shoulder scoring system

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Not provided at time of registration

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026