Comparing the Effectiveness of Training

Comparing the Effectiveness of Moral Intelligence Training and Self-Determination Skills Training on Improving Peer Relationships, Academic Ethics, Academic Cheating, and Academic Persistence

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20260505069271N1

Enrollment

Registered

2026-05-08

Start date

2026-06-05

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Students’ Academic Status.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Moral intelligence training refers to the boundary between altruism and selfishness within the domain of moral intelligence, which denotes the capacity and ability

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Male

Age

15 Years to 17 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Being at least 15 and at most 17 years old Having an informed consent form signed by both the parents and the student to participate in the training sessions Studying in the same selected schools during the research period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Having psychological problems Having physical problems that interfere with the research process Taking psychiatric medications Using psychoactive or narcotic drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
????? ?? ???????. Timepoint: before performing the intervention and two weeks after completion of the intervention. Method of measurement: Hudson Peer Relationship Index (1992).;Academic Ethics. Timepoint: before performing the intervention and two weeks after completion of the intervention. Method of measurement: Golparvar Academic Ethics Questionnaire (2009).;Academic Cheating. Timepoint: before performing the intervention and two weeks after completion of the intervention. Method of measurement: Stevens and Golebach Academic Cheating Questionnaire (2007).;Academic Persistence. Timepoint: before performing the intervention and two weeks after completion of the intervention. Method of measurement: Martin and Marsh Academic Persistence Questionnaire (2008).	—

Measure

Time frame

????? ?? ???????. Timepoint: before performing the intervention and two weeks after completion of the intervention. Method of measurement: Hudson Peer Relationship Index (1992).;Academic Ethics. Timepoint: before performing the intervention and two weeks after completion of the intervention. Method of measurement: Golparvar Academic Ethics Questionnaire (2009).;Academic Cheating. Timepoint: before performing the intervention and two weeks after completion of the intervention. Method of measurement: Stevens and Golebach Academic Cheating Questionnaire (2007).;Academic Persistence. Timepoint: before performing the intervention and two weeks after completion of the intervention. Method of measurement: Martin and Marsh Academic Persistence Questionnaire (2008).

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactSeyed Mohammadhasan Tayyebzadeh

Islamic Azad University

Tayebzadeh1020@gmail.com+98 916 303 6337

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026