Ora-aid vs. composite barrier in palatal wound healing

Comparative effect of Ora-aid vs. peripheral seal composite barrier in palatal wound healing after free gingival graft

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20260128068689N1

Enrollment

Registered

2026-05-21

Start date

2026-05-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Palatal wound.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Ora-aid is used over the gelfoam and wound after hemostasis and fixed by nylon 4-0 suture. Intervention 2: Control group: Flowable composite is used to form the don

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Between 18 to 65 years old No systemic disease Full mouth plaque score < 20%

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Administration of anti-coagulants or immuno-suppressive drugs Smoking Pregnancy or breast feeding

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Palatal wound healing. Timepoint: Evaluating the palatal wound healing by modified landry index on days 7,14 and 30. Method of measurement: Modified landry index table.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Pain. Timepoint: Visual Analogue Scale on days 1,3,7 and 14 patient discomfort and willingness to repeat the surgery on days 7 and 14. Method of measurement: Visual Analogue Scale.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactShabnam ganjezadeh

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

Ganjehzadehsh@mums.ac.ir+98 51 3882 9501

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026