Skip to content

The Effect of Using Osseodensification Drills on the Stability of Dental Implants

The Effect of Using Osseodensification Drills on the Stability of Dental Implants in the Maxilla: A Randomized Split-Mouth Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20260124068649N1
Enrollment
12
Registered
2026-01-30
Start date
2026-02-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Maxillary Partial Edentulism requiring Dental Implants. Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention 1: Interventions group: In the intervention group, implant site preparation will be performed using the osseodensification technique. For this purpose, the Charisma osseodensification dri

Sponsors

Rasht University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age 18 years or older Indication for placement of two implants in the premolar regions on both sides of the jaw, in edentulous areas at least 6 months after tooth extraction Bone density: D3–D4

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Presence of acute or chronic infection or local pathology at the intended implant placement site Patients with parafunctional habits Limitations to implant placement, such as insufficient vertical bone height Use of medications that interfere with bone healing, such as corticosteroids, hormone therapy, or bisphosphonates History of uncontrolled systemic diseases or conditions that interfere with bone healing, including smoking, diabetes, immunosuppression, fibrous dysplasia, bleeding disorders, hyperparathyroidism, pregnancy, and a history of head and neck radiotherapy or chemotherapy within the past 5 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Implant Stability. Timepoint: Immediately, 2, 8, and 12 weeks after implant placement. Method of measurement: Implant stability will be measured using the AnyCheck device (Neo Biotech, South Korea) in direct contact with the healing abutment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Marginal Bone Loss. Timepoint: Three months after implant placement. Method of measurement: Measurement of the distance between the first thread of the implant and the crestal bone on parallel periapical radiographs, recorded in tenths of a millimeter.;Patient-reported Pain & Discomfort. Timepoint: Immediately after the surgery and one week after implant placement. Method of measurement: The level of pain and discomfort experienced by patients will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).;Initial survival rate. Timepoint: Three months after implant placement. Method of measurement: Evaluating the survival rate of the implants in the follow-up session.;Bone density. Timepoint: 12 weeks after implant placement. Method of measurement: The bone density of the area around the implant will be classified using CBCT and the Lekholm & Zarb classification into five categories: D1, D2, D3, D4, and D5.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAshkan Salari

Rasht University of Medical Sciences

Drashkan_salary@yahoo.com+98 13 3348 6406

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026