Skip to content

Effect of culturally adapted behavioral activation play therapy on adolescent mental health

Comparison of the effectiveness of culturally adapted game-based behavioral activation therapy (CA-BAPT) and cognitive behavioral therapy in reducing anhedonia among adolescents

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20251116068014N3
Enrollment
900
Registered
2026-04-05
Start date
2026-04-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anhedonia in adolescents.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Participants in the intervention group will receive culturally adapted game-based behavioral activation therapy in a group format. The intervention will consist of

Sponsors

White Rose Psychological Chain Clinics affiliated with Imam Khomeini Relief Foundation
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
13 Years to 18 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adolescents aged 13 to 18 years Moderate to high levels of anhedonia based on the Snaith–Hamilton Pleasure Scale Ability to read and understand Persian Written informed consent obtained from the adolescent Written informed consent obtained from a parent or legal guardian Willingness to participate in group based psychological sessions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Presence of active psychotic disorders Severe cognitive impairment or severe developmental disorder interfering with effective participation Concurrent participation in other psychological or psychotherapeutic interventions Inability to cooperate with study assessments based on clinical judgment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Anhedonia severity score in adolescents based on the Snaith Hamilton Pleasure Scale. Timepoint: Assessment at baseline before intervention; posttreatment at week 12; 3 month follow up. Method of measurement: Anhedonia severity measured using the Snaith Hamilton Pleasure Scale self report questionnaire validated for adolescents.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Adolescent stress severity score. Timepoint: Assessment at baseline before intervention; posttreatment at week 12;3 month follow up. Method of measurement: Stress severity is measured using the Adolescent Stress Questionnaire, developed by Susan M. Byrne and colleagues, which has been validated for use in adolescent populations.;Psychological well being score in adolescents. Timepoint: Assessment at baseline before intervention; posttreatment at week 12; 3 month follow up. Method of measurement: Psychological well being is measured using the Mental Health Continuum Short Form self report questionnaire, developed by Corey L. M. Keyes, which has been validated for use in adolescent populations.;Resilience score in adolescents. Timepoint: Assessment at baseline before intervention; posttreatment at week 12;3 month follow up. Method of measurement: Resilience is measured using the Child and Youth Resilience Measure Revised, revised by Polly Jefferies and colleagues, and validated for use in adolescent populations.;Sleep hygiene score in adolescents. Timepoint: Assessment at baseline before intervention; posttreatment at week 12; 3 month follow up. Method of measurement: Sleep hygiene is measured using the Adolescent Sleep Hygiene Scale Revised, developed by Monika K. LeBourgeois and colleagues, and validated for use in adolescent populations.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactKhatereh Arbabi

White Rose Psychological Chain Clinics affiliated with Imam Khomeini Relief Foundation

arbabikhatere@gmail.com+98 21 2294 2918

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026