Skip to content

A study on using a covering layer from the temple muscle along with a small piece of cartilage in eardrum repair surgery

Comparison of the effectiveness of island cartilage graft combined with temporalis fascia versus island cartilage graft alone on the complete healing rate of the tympanic membrane in patients with tympanic membrane perforation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20251103067872N2
Enrollment
70
Registered
2025-12-17
Start date
2026-02-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic otitis media. Perforation of tympanic membrane

Interventions

Intervention 1: Control Group:Two-layer Tympanoplasty Technique: Underlay tympanoplasty using a composite tragal island cartilage-perichondrium graft. Following freshening of the perforation margins,

Sponsors

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients must be between 18 and 65 years of age. Patients must be candidates for tympanoplasty surgery. The ear must be dry upon pre-operative examination. The tympanic membrane perforation must be of moderate size. The edges of the perforation must be acceptable and well-defined intraoperatively.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Presence of purulent discharge during intraoperative examination under anesthesia. Requirement for mastoidectomy due to mastoid pathology (e.g., cholesteatoma, advanced ear infection, granulation tissue, or extensive tympanosclerosis plaque). Individuals with diabetes or immune deficiency. History of smoking or tobacco use. Unstable ossicular chain status. Extensive or marginal tympanic membrane perforations.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Hearing improvement: measured by audiometry 2 months after surgery. This is the main quantitative measure used to assess the effect of the intervention (two-layer vs. three-layer graft).Graft success / tympanic membrane repair – evaluated by microscopic examination at 2 and 6 months after surgery. This is a separate outcome measuring anatomical success of the graft. Timepoint: 6 months after surgery. Method of measurement: Hearing improvement is measured by performing pure tone audiometry in a soundproof chamber and according to standard protocols.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Anatomical graft success, assessed via microscopic examination for graft integrity, absence of perforation, granulation tissue, discharge, or other local complications. Timepoint: 2 months and 6 months after surgery. Method of measurement: Pure-tone audiometry was performed in a soundproof booth according to standard protocols. Air conduction thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz were measured, and the average air-bone gap was calculated.;. Timepoint: . Method of measurement: .

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactNazila Shiravani

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

yousefzaishayan@sums.ac.ir+98 71 3629 1470

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026