Skip to content

A Comparative Study of Vonoprazan and Pantoprazole in the Treatment of NERD and Erosive Esophagitis

Comparison of the Effectiveness and Adverse Effects of Phorize (Vonoprazan) Versus Pantoprazole in Controlling Symptoms of Non-Erosive Reflux Disease (NERD) and Clinical Improvement of Erosive Esophagitis (EE)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20251101067844N1
Enrollment
730
Registered
2026-01-13
Start date
2026-01-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease. Gastro-esophageal reflux disease

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group one: Erosive Esophagitis (EE), Vonoprazan Arm, Participants will receive vonoprazan (phorize, Abidi) 20 milligrams tablets once daily for 8 weeks as initial treatmen

Sponsors

Abidi Pharmaceutical company
Lead Sponsor
Iran University of Medical Sciences
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: diagnosis of Non-Erosive Reflux Disease (NERD) or Erosive Esophagitis (EE) based on endoscopy, with any severity level requiring pharmacologic treatment Patients diagnosed with NERD or EE by an experienced and active endoscopist within the past 6 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Refractory erosive esophagitis or previous failure to respond to treatment with proton pump inhibitors History of fundoplication surgery or gastrectomy. History of Barrett’s esophagus or esophageal dysplasia. Presence of peptic ulcer disease. History of gastrointestinal bleeding or endoscopic stigmata of recent bleeding Severe dyspeptic symptoms Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease Moderate to severe hepatic impairment Pregnancy, intention to become pregnant, or breastfeeding. Concomitant Use of Rilpivirine, Digoxin, Methotrexate, Diuretics

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Total heartburn-free time (Daytime). Timepoint: The time of intervention is considered as week 0. Non-erosive reflux arm: right before starting the treatment (week 0), week 4 and week 8, Erosive esophagitis arm: right before starting the treatment (week 0), week 4, week 8, week 12, week 16, week 20, week 24. Method of measurement: Single designed form (By study researchers) for recording daytime and nighttime symptoms and the use of rescue medications for symptom control.;Total heartburn-free time (night time). Timepoint: The time of intervention is considered as week 0. Non-erosive reflux arm: right before starting treatment (week 0), week 4 and week 8, Erosive esophagitis arm: right before starting treatment (week 0), week 4, week 8, week 12, week 16, week 20, week 24. Method of measurement: Single designed form (By study researchers) for recording daytime and nighttime symptoms and the use of rescue medications for symptom control.;Total Heartburn free days. Timepoint: The time of intervention is considered as week 0. Non-erosive reflux arm: right before starting treatment (week 0), week 4 and week 8, Erosive esophagitis arm: right before starting treatment (week 0), week 4, week 8, week 12, week 16, week 20, week 24. Method of measurement: Single designed form (By study researchers) for recording daytime and nighttime symptoms and the use of rescue medications for symptom control.;Percentage of Heartburn-free individuals at the end of the study. Timepoint: The time of intervention is considered as week 0. Non-erosive reflux arm: right before starting treatment (week 0), week 4 and week 8, Erosive esophagitis arm: right before starting treatment (week 0), week 4, week 8, week 12, week 16, week 20, week 24. Method of measurement: Single designed form (By study researchers) for recording daytime and nighttime symptoms and the use of rescue medications for symptom control.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The GERD-Q (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire) Score. Timepoint: The time of intervention is considered as week 0. Non-erosive reflux arm: right before starting treatment (week 0), week 4 and week 8, Erosive esophagitis arm: right before starting treatment (week 0), week 4, week 8, week 12, week 16, week 20, week 24. Method of measurement: the GERD-Q (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire).;Score of GSAS : GERD Symptom Assessment Scale. Timepoint: The time of intervention is considered as week 0. Non-erosive reflux arm: right before starting treatment (week 0), week 4 and week 8, Erosive esophagitis arm: right before starting treatment (week 0), week 4, week 8, week 12, week 16, week 20, week 24. Method of measurement: GSAS : GERD Symptom Assessment Scale Queestionnaire.;Adverse effects. Timepoint: The time of intervention is considered as week 0. Non-erosive reflux arm: right before starting treatment (week 0), week 4 and week 8, Erosive esophagitis arm: right before starting treatment (week 0), week 4, week 8, week 12, week 16, week 20, week 24. Method of measurement: pre-designed forms of adverse effects.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactShahram Agah

Iran University of Medical Sciences

shahram.agah@isge.ir+98 21 6435 2358

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026