Skip to content

?????? ??????? ??????? ????? ???? ??????? ?? ????? ????? ???? ????? ????? ?? ????? ??? ??????-???????? ??? ?? ????? ????? ?? ??????? ????? ????

A comparison of the effectiveness of the redirected phonation technique with the manual laryngeal reposturing maneuver on the acoustic-perceptual characteristics of voice in male with mutational falsetto

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20251019067682N1
Enrollment
24
Registered
2025-11-05
Start date
2025-11-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mutational Falsetto.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: manual laryngeal reposturing maneuver. Intervention 2: Control group: Redirected phonation technique.

Sponsors

Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male
Age
14 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Male participants with a vocal complaint of having a thin or high-pitched voice Presence of normal vocal fold structures as confirmed by stroboscopic evaluation Having a habitual speaking fundamental frequency higher than 180 Hz The speaking voice range corresponding to the female frequency domain Age range between 14 and 40 years No history of hearing loss, hormonal disorders, neurological diseases, or head and neck surgeries. No prior participation in voice therapy programs or other related treatments for their voice problem, either before or concurrently with the study Absence of upper respiratory tract infections or common colds at the time of the initial and final assessments and within three weeks prior to them No history or presence of gastrointestinal diseases, except for gastroesophageal reflux, due to its relatively high prevalence

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Fundamental frequency. Timepoint: Before and immediately after the intervention. Method of measurement: Acoustic analysis.;Jitter. Timepoint: Before and immediately after the intervention. Method of measurement: Acoustic analysis.;Shimmer. Timepoint: Before and immediately after the intervention. Method of measurement: Acoustic Analysis.;Harmonic to noise ratio. Timepoint: Before and immediately after the intervention. Method of measurement: Acoustic Analysis.;Cepstral peak prominence. Timepoint: Before and immediately after the intervention. Method of measurement: Acoustic Analysis.;Cepstral peak prominence smoothed. Timepoint: Before and immediately after the intervention. Method of measurement: Acoustic Analysis.;Voice Handicap Index-30. Timepoint: Before and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: Self-assessment.;Depression, Anxiety, Stress scale-21. Timepoint: Before and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: Self-assessment.;Neuroticism, Openness and Extraversion (NEO) Five-Factor Inventory. Timepoint: Before and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: Self-assessment.;Overall dysphonia severity. Timepoint: Before and immediately after the intervention. Method of measurement: Auditory-perceptual assessment.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactFateme Zahra Adabi Mohazzab

Tehran University of Medical Sciences

adaby78@gmail.com+98 21 8822 3165

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026