Skip to content

Effectiveness and safety of vaginal probiotic application compared to vaginal estrogen cream on menopausal induced disorders

Effectiveness and safety of vaginal probiotic application compared to vaginal estrogen cream on menopausal induced disorders

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20251007067534N1
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-01-05
Start date
2026-01-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

menopause. Postmenopausal atrophic vaginitis

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Fifty participants received Iranian vaginal probiotic capsules, each package containing 12 capsules with an applicator. Each participant was provided with two packa

Sponsors

This study was self-funded.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
40 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Postmenopausal women experiencing symptoms of vaginal dryness.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Unwillingness or inability to participate in the study or complete study procedures Contraindications to estrogen cream use, including: History of estrogen-sensitive cancers (e.g., breast cancer), Active vaginal infections or significant cervical pathologies, History of thromboembolic events or severe cardiovascular disease. Contraindications to vaginal probiotic use, such as: Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any component of the probiotic formulation, Immunocompromised status, which may increase the risk of infection or microbial imbalance, or active infection status observed in the participant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1) Severity of vaginal symptoms, including itching, burning, pain, irritability, dryness, discharge, and abnormal vaginal odor. Timepoint: Time Points:1) Baseline assessment prior to the start of treatment.2) Main assessment at the end of the third week of treatment.3) Follow-up assessments every 12 weeks from treatment initiation, until the end of the study period (12 weeks). A total of 3 times will be conducted. Method of measurement: Outcomes are measured using a standard questionnaire based on the Kupperman Index, which rates symptom severity on a 5-point scale: 1 (none), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), 5 (very severe).Questionnaires are completed by participants, and data are collected and analyzed in the field.;2) Severity of dyspareunia (pain or discomfort during sexual intercourse). These outcomes are considered dependent variables and are measured using a qualitative rating scale. Timepoint: Time Points:1) Baseline assessment prior to the start of treatment.2) Main assessment at the end of the third week of treatment.3) Follow-up assessments every 12 weeks from treatment initiation, until the end of the study period (12 weeks). A total of 3 times will be conducted. Method of measurement: Outcomes are measured using a standard questionnaire based on the Kupperman Index, which rates symptom severity on a 5-point scale: 1 (none), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), 5 (very severe).Questionnaires are completed by participants, and data are collected and analyzed in the field.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Maryam Deldar Pasikhani

Tehran University of Medical Sciences

deldarmaryam56@gmail.com+98 21 6119 2271

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026