Comparative study of the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus conventional C-arm-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20250928067401N1

Enrollment

116

Registered

2025-10-07

Start date

2025-10-30

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nephrolithotomy. -

Interventions

Intervention 1: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy group. Intervention 2: conventional C-arm-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria included patients aged 18–70 years with kidney stones 2–4 cm in diameter, ASA class I–III, normal coagulation tests (PT, aPTT, INR), informed consentExclusion criteria included patients with coagulation disorders or anticoagulant use, pregnancy, history of hypersensitivity to epinephrine or hemostatic agents, acute urinary tract infection or sepsis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Timepoint: During and after surgery. Method of measurement: Based on laboratory results and during surgery.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactSirous Rafiei Asl

Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences

rafieiasl-s@ajums.ac.ir+98 939 556 6827

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026