Proximal humerus fracture. Upper end humerus fracture
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention 1: The intervention of interest in this study is the surgical fixation of proximal humeral fractures using an anatomical locking plate (PHILOS plate). The difference between the two study
Sponsors
Arak University of Medical Sciences
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
17 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Age 17 years old minimum Close fracture Norovascular exam normal Neer,s 2,3&4 part fractures Consent to participate in the study
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Presence of severe comorbid psychiatric disorders Known sensitivity or intolerance to the study intervention Inability or unwillingness to adhere to follow-up protocol
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Rang of motions. Timepoint: 15day . 30 day . 3 months .6 months ofter surgery. Method of measurement: Examination and constant m orely score.;Activity of daily living. Timepoint: 15 day. 30 day. 3 months .6 months ofter surgery. Method of measurement: Examination and constant Morely score. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Pain in patient moves. Timepoint: 15 day ,30 day ,3 months ,6 months ofter surgery. Method of measurement: Examination and constant Morey score. | — |
Countries
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Contacts
Public ContactJamshid Rahemi
Arak University of Medical Sciences
Outcome results
None listed