Skip to content

Predicting Occupational Low Back Pain in Nurses Using Artificial Intelligence and Evaluating the Effectiveness of Ergonomic Interventions

Prediction of Occupational Low Back Pain in Nurses Using an Artificial Intelligence Approach and Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Ergonomic Interventions: A Case Study in Hospitals of Hamadan City

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20250806066777N1
Enrollment
68
Registered
2025-10-22
Start date
2025-08-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Occupational low back pain in nurses. Low back pain

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Intervention arm 1 (Exercise): A structured program for trunk and lower limbs including stretching and strengthening. Two sessions per week, thirty to forty-five mi
participants remain under usual care. After completion, educational materials or the exercise program may be offered.

Sponsors

Hamedan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Nurses with at least one year of work experience in hospitals in Hamadan city. Nurses in good general health and free from chronic diseases No history of surgery in the back or lower limbs. Nurses willing to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Nurses with acute musculoskeletal disorders requiring immediate treatment or medical care Pregnant nurses.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Low back pain intensity – measured using the McGill Pain Questionnaire at two time points: before the intervention and three months after the intervention. Functional disability – measured using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire at two time points: before the intervention and three months after the intervention. Timepoint: Before the intervention and three months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Low back pain intensity: Measured using the validated Persian version of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Functional disability: Measured using the validated Persian version of the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Functional Movement Screen (FMS) score. Timepoint: Baseline and end of week 12 (post-intervention). Method of measurement: The Functional Movement Screen comprising seven standardized tasks is administered and scored by a trained assessor following the official manual. After uniform instructions and a brief familiarization, each task is scored from zero to three; the sum is recorded as the total score.;Y-Balance Test (YBT) score. Timepoint: Baseline and week 12. Method of measurement: The Y Balance Test is performed in the anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions. Three valid trials are recorded per direction. Limb length is measured from the anterior superior iliac spine to the medial malleolus, and the composite score is calculated after normalization to limb length under standardized procedures.;Gait speed during comfortable walking. Timepoint: Baseline; week 12. Method of measurement: Participants walk along a straight walkway at a comfortable, steady pace. Gait is captured using the Qualisys optical motion capture system with a standardized lower-limb marker set at a sampling frequency of at least one hundred hertz. Acceleration and deceleration zones at the beginning and end are excluded, and gait speed is calculated as distance divided by elapsed time.;Percentage of plantar contact area on Foot-scan. Timepoint: Baseline and week 12. Method of measurement: Plantar pressure is recorded during comfortable over-ground walking using a calibrated Foot scan pressure platform with a sampling frequency of at least one hundred hertz. The software identifies contact pixels using a predefined threshold. Heel, midfoot, forefoot (and toes if required) are defined by standardized regional masks, and the “percentage of contact area of each region relative to the total plantar contact area” is computed and recorded. At least three valid steps per limb are collected and averaged.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAtousa Rezayi

Hamedan University of Medical Sciences

Atousa.Rezayi@gmail.com+98 81 3838 0717

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026