Skip to content

Evaluation of the Effect of HIFU on Facial Rejuvenation

Evaluating the Efficacy of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Compared to Placebo on Improving Facial Skin Laxity Based on Biometric Indices: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20250805066764N1
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-12-14
Start date
2025-09-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Facial Skin Aging.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: On the assigned intervention side, treatment will be performed using a High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) device, model Doublo Gold, manufactured by Nik Laser

Sponsors

Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
35 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age between 30 to 65 years No facial rejuvenation procedures within the past 6 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of keloid or hypertrophic scar Active skin diseases (psoriasis, vitiligo, lichen planus, lupus, herpes) History of solar urticaria Uncontrolled diabetes (controlled diabetes is acceptable with physician approval) Epilepsy Metallic implants in the treatment area (dental implants are not a limitation) Current use of anticoagulant drugs Acute fever or infection (including skin or fungal infection) Recent sunburn or tanning (within 20–25 days) Pregnancy Hyaluronic acid or botulinum toxin injection within the past 2–3 months Laser treatment within the past 1 month Recent dermal filler injection Autoimmune diseases Bell’s palsy asthma hypertension thyroid disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Global Aesthetic Assessment Scale (GAAS) score by the physician. Timepoint: Baseline (before intervention), 1 month post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention. Method of measurement: Clinical assessment by a blinded physician based on comparing standardized photographs at different time points. The GAIS score is a 5-point scale (5=very much improved, 4=improved, 3=no change, 2=worse, 1=very much worse).;Patient satisfaction score with treatment outcomes. Timepoint: 3 months post-intervention. Method of measurement: Self-administered questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale (5=very satisfied, 4=satisfied, 3=neutral, 2=dissatisfied, 1=very dissatisfied).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Skin elasticity (R2 parameter). Timepoint: At baseline (before intervention), 1 month post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention. Method of measurement: Measured by the Cutometer® MPA 580 device. The R2 parameter, which is representing the ability of the skin to return to its original state after suction, will be recorded.;Skin hydration of the stratum corneum. Timepoint: At baseline (before intervention), 1 month post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention. Method of measurement: Measured by the Corneometer® CM 825 device based on skin capacitance. Results are expressed in arbitrary units (A.U.).;Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL) rate. Timepoint: Baseline (before intervention), 1 month, and 3 months post-intervention. Method of measurement: Measured by the Tewameter® TM 300 device. Results are recorded in grams per square meter per hour (g/m 2 /h) and indicate the skin barrier function.;Dermal thickness. Timepoint: Baseline (before intervention), 1 month, and 3 months post-intervention. Method of measurement: Measured using high-frequency ultrasound (20 MHz). Thickness is measured in millimeters (mm) from the dermal-epidermal junction to the dermal-hypodermal junction.;Echogenic density of the dermis. Timepoint: Baseline (before intervention), 1 month, and 3 months post-intervention. Method of measurement: Analysis of images from high-frequency ultrasound (20 MHz). Density is measured as the echo-intensity in the dermis, indicating collagen density.;Incidence and severity of adverse effects. Timepoint: Immediately post-intervention, 1 month, and 3 months post-intervention. Method of measurement: Clinical assessment and patient reporting for adverse effects such as erythema, edema, pain, bruising, and burns. Severity is graded on a 4-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe).

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactShiva Alavi

Tehran University of Medical Sciences

shiva.alavi@yahoo.com+98 21 2665 7541

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026