Skip to content

Comparing the effect of Clindamycin and Cefaloxin versus Clindamycin and Cefazolin antibiotic regimens in reducing infection cases after elective cesarean section

Comparing the effect of Clindamycin and Cefaloxin versus Clindamycin and Cefazolin antibiotic regimens in reducing infection cases after elective cesarean section in patients with BMI>30

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20250607066094N1
Enrollment
110
Registered
2025-08-07
Start date
2025-03-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical Site Infection.

Interventions

Intervention group: The first group, in addition to the routine prophylactic regimen (cefazolin) during surgery and clindamycin tablets after transfer to the ward and immediately after they are able t

Sponsors

Bandare-abbas University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women with a gestational age of over 38 weeks who undergo elective cesarean section. BMI>30

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Emergency cesarean section (meconium tic, ruptured membranes, preeclampsia, etc.) Immune-compromised patients, patients with renal failure Patients who are allergic to cefazolin or clindamycin or cephalexin Patients who have recently received an antibiotic regimen within the last three months Diabetic patients or a history of GDM

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Surgical Site Infection. Timepoint: Day of operation, day of discharge, one week after discharge. Method of measurement: Based on SIRS Criteria.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAnousheh Salehi

Bandare-abbas University of Medical Sciences

hospital.drshariati@gmail.com+98 939 397 8737

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026