Skip to content

Comparing the effects of laser and surgery in accelerating orthodontic treatment

Comparison of the effect of piezoincision and photobiomodulation on canine retraction rate in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20250526065916N2
Enrollment
32
Registered
2025-10-21
Start date
2025-10-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orthodontic Problems. Malocclusion, Angle's class II

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group 1: Photobiomodulation therapy: In the first intervention group, low-level laser therapy was performed twice a week for four weeks via a continuous-wave mode laser (E

Sponsors

Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
14 Years to 27 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age of 14 to 27 Healthy patients with good oral hygiene and periodontal status Class II, div I individuals who require bilateral maxillary first premolar extraction followed by canine retraction No history of orthodontic treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Presence of systemic diseases Presence of dental phobia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Canine retraction rate. Timepoint: Before intervention, 1 month after intervention, 2 months after intervention. Method of measurement: orthodontic software package.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Avideh Maboudi

Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences

avideh.maboudi@gmail.com+98 11 3304 4030

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026