Skip to content

Comparison of Single-Visit and Conventional Regenerative Endodontic Treatments

Clinical comparison of single visit regenerative endodontic treatment with conventional approach: (A double-blinded randomized clinical trial)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20250512065693N1
Enrollment
26
Registered
2025-09-21
Start date
2025-08-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Regenerative Endodontic. Necrosis of pulp

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Single visit of regenerative endodontics.The treatment involves canal irrigation with 1.5% Sodium Hypochlorite, 17% EDTA, and normal saline, induction of bleeding i

Sponsors

Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
8 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The participant’s age is above eight years. The target tooth has a necrotic pulpand an open apex. The patient is generally in good health and does not have any allergies to the drugs and antibiotics used during the treatment process. The immature permanent target tooth is restorable and does not require a post and core.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The patient is uncooperative for treatment. The patient or their guardian does not consent to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Root dentin wall thickness. Timepoint: Before the intervention, 12 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: The thickness of the root dentin wall of the target tooth will be measured using digital radiographic images and specialized image analysis software (ImageJ), before the intervention and 12 months after the intervention.Measurement tool: Digital radiographic image analysis software (ImageJ).;Root length. Timepoint: Before the intervention, 12 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Root length is measured in millimeters from the floor of the pulp chamber to the apex of the root using digital radiographic images and analysis with ImageJ software.Measurement tool: Digital radiography with analysis by ImageJ software.;Apical closure of the root. Timepoint: Before the intervention, 12 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Root apex closure will be documented by radiographic evaluation of post-treatment images based on radiological criteria.Specialized tools: CBCT radiography and assessment by a radiologist using ImageJ software.;Response to pulp sensibility test. Timepoint: Before the intervention, and at 3, 6, and 12 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: The tooth’s response to pulp sensibility testing (using an electric pulp tester or cold test) is recorded based on the observed criteria, and the pulp vitality status is determined accordingly. Specific instruments: Electric Pulp Tester or Cold Test.;Presence or absence of clinical signs (such as pain, swelling, sinus tract). Timepoint: Before the intervention, and at 3, 6, and 12 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Recording the presence or absence of clinical symptoms, including pain, swelling, or fistula, through clinical examination at each follow-up visit.Special tools: Symptom registration questionnaire and clinical examination checklist completed by a specialist.;Status of periapical lesion based on radiographic evaluation. Timepo

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactParisa Jalali

Tabriz University of Medical Sciences

pjalali1376@gmail.com+98 41 3335 5965

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026