Palliative care, Advanced chronic diseases, Cancer, End-of-life.
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Undergraduate nursing students Currently enrolled in semesters 3 to 6 At least one semester of clinical experience Willingness to participate in the study Completion of written informed consent form No prior participation in palliative care training courses
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: No clinical experience. Previous participation in palliative care training courses Unwillingness to participate in the study. Failure to complete the written informed consent form Enrollment in semesters other than 3 to 6 (i.e., semesters 1–2 or beyond 6)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Score of knowledge in palliative care measured by the Palliative Care Quiz for Nurses (PCQN) developed by Ross et al. (1996), consisting of 20 multiple-choice items (true, false, do not know); higher scores indicate greater knowledge. Assessment occurs at three time points: before the intervention, immediately after, and one month later.Score of self-efficacy in palliative care measured by the Palliative Care Self-Efficacy Scale developed by Phillips et al. (2011), evaluating students’ perceived ability to manage symptoms and provide psychosocial support; higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy. Measured at three time points: before the intervention, immediately after, and one month later. Timepoint: Measurements will be conducted at three time points: before the start of the educational intervention, immediately after the completion of the sessions, and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: The level of knowledge will be measured using the “Palliative Care Quiz for Nurses” developed by Ross and colleagues in the year nineteen ninety-six.The level of self-efficacy will be assessed using the “Palliative Care Self-Efficacy Scale” developed by Phillips and colleagues in the year two thousand eleven.The level of educational satisfaction will be measured using the “Satisfaction with Teaching Method Questionnaire” developed by Sadeghnejad and colleagues in the year two thousand thirteen. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The students’ satisfaction score with the received teaching method will be measured using the “Satisfaction with Teaching Method Questionnaire” developed by Sadeghnejad and colleagues in the year two thousand thirteen; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the instructional approach. Timepoint: The level of satisfaction with the teaching method will be measured immediately after the completion of the educational sessions in both intervention groups. Method of measurement: The level of students’ satisfaction with the teaching method will be measured using the “Satisfaction with Teaching–Learning Strategy Questionnaire” developed by Sadeghnejad and colleagues in the year two thousand thirteen. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the teaching method. | — |
Countries
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Contacts
Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch