Skip to content

The effect of supportive educative program on quality of life and caregiver burden of patients with hip fracture

The effect of supportive educative program on quality of life and caregiver burden of patients with hip fracture

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20250329065176N2
Enrollment
70
Registered
2025-04-30
Start date
2025-05-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Caregivers of hip fracture patients. Fracture of head and neck of femur

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: In this study, the intervention involved a supportive educative program for caregivers of patients with hip fracture. No medications, chemical agents, surgeries, or

Sponsors

Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: being a relative or family member of the patient actively participating in the home care of a hip fracture patient demonstrating a willingness to engage in the study being at least 18 years of age possessing literacy skills having no psychological or neurological disorders

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: lack of caregiver cooperation participation in similar educational programs the occurrence of family crises during the study voluntary withdrawal from the study,

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Caregivers' caregiving pressure questionnaire (CBI). Timepoint: Before the start of the intervention and 14 days after the last day of the intervention. Method of measurement: The Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI) consists of 24 items, which were developed by Novak & Guest in 1989 to measure objective and subjective caregiving burden, and it measures subjective caregiving burden with greater emphasis. This questionnaire consists of five subscales: time-related caregiving burden (questions 1 to 5), developmental caregiving burden (questions 6 to 10), physical caregiving burden (questions 11 to 14), social caregiving burden (questions 15 to 19), and emotional caregiving burden (questions 20 to 24). The caregivers' responses will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale (completely false to completely true), so that the samples will choose one of the following options for each question: completely false (score 1), false (score 2), somewhat true (score 3), true (score 4), and completely true (score 5). Accordingly, the scores obtained from this questionnaire will range from 24 to 120, and according to the mean and standard deviation of the total caregiving stress scores, scores of 24 to 39 will be considered mild caregiving stress, 40 to 71 moderate caregiving stress, and 72 to 120 severe caregiving stress (Abbasi et al., 2012).;SF-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire. Timepoint: Before the start of the intervention and 14 days after the last day of the intervention. Method of measurement: The SF-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire has 36 items divided into three levels: 1- Questions 2- Eight scales, each of which is obtained by combining 2 to 10 questions, which are: physical function, physical limitation, physical pain, general health, vitality, social function, mental problems, and mental health 3- A summary bi-scale that is formed by combining the scales in the form of physical health (physical function, physical limitation, physical pain, general health) and mental health (so

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactGolnar Ghane

Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Golnarghane@gmail.com+98 21 6692 7171

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026