Skip to content

The comparison of the effectiveness of sensory-motor integration and cognitive rehabilitation on slow learner students

The comparison of the effectiveness of sensory-motor integration and cognitive rehabilitation on executive functions (attention, working memory and inhibition), fine motor skills, and reading of slow learner students

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20250306064948N1
Enrollment
45
Registered
2025-05-06
Start date
2025-05-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Weaknesses in Executive Functions (Attention, Working Memory, Inhibition) of Slow Learner Students, Weaknesses in Fine Motor Skills of Slow Learner Students, Weaknesses in Reading Skills of Slow Learner Students.

Interventions

Intervention 1: The first intervention group with Sensory- Motor Integration Method: 15 eligible subjects were randomly assigned to this group and provided with a sensory - motor integration training

Sponsors

Islamic Azad University- Ahvaz Branch
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
8 Years to 13 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Attendance in primary education except for the first grade Having a borderline intellectual functioning

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Having potential comorbid disorders Receiving simultaneous rehabilitation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Executive Functions (attention, working memory ,inhibition) of slow learner students. Timepoint: Measuring Executive Functions (Attention, Working Memory, Inhibition) of slow learner students at the beginning of the study (before the intervention) and after 14 sessions of implementing two rehabilitation methods for each participant in two intervention groups. Method of measurement: Measurement of Executive Functions (Attention with the Stroop Test, Working Memory with the WMTB-C Test, Inhibition with the Go-No Go Test).;Fine motor skills of slow learner students. Timepoint: Measuring Fine Motor Skills of slow learner students at the beginning of the study (before the intervention) and after 14 sessions of implementing two rehabilitation methods for each participant in two intervention groups. Method of measurement: Measurement of Fine Motor Skills with the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test.;Reading of slow learner students. Timepoint: Measuring Reading of slow learner students at the beginning of the study (before the intervention) and after 14 sessions of implementing two rehabilitation methods for each participant in two intervention groups. Method of measurement: Measurement of Reading Skills with the Nema Reading Test.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMaryam Fazel Masaeli

Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch

Maryamfm49@gmail.com+98 11 3321 6156

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026