Comparison of the effect of the software with the workshop

Comparison of the effect of the software together with the workshop and the workshop alone on oral ulcer education in dental students

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20241128063884N1

Enrollment

Registered

2025-01-28

Start date

2024-12-30

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention 1: Control group: A group of 30 individuals who are scheduled to participate in a workshop solely focused on oral lesion education. During this two-hour workshop, students will be instruc

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The students of the 4th and 6th semesters (inputs of 1402 and 1403) are going to be taught the topic of oral ulcers.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Students who have been trained on the topic of mouth ulcers. Students who are more than one academic year away from learning this topic (in the educational curriculum). Lower semester students who are familiar with this topic in any way

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Two tests will be administered to the students: a 10-question case-based and multiple-choice test on oral lesions before the workshop and software session to assess their familiarity with the topic, and a similar 10-question test after the training. The test content will align with the instructor’s teaching and the Burket’s textbook. The researcher will compare the average scores of the two tests. Timepoint: Pre-test in one day and final test immediately after the sessions (second and third day). Method of measurement: Comparison of the average score of the pre-test and the final test.	—

Measure

Time frame

Two tests will be administered to the students: a 10-question case-based and multiple-choice test on oral lesions before the workshop and software session to assess their familiarity with the topic, and a similar 10-question test after the training. The test content will align with the instructor’s teaching and the Burket’s textbook. The researcher will compare the average scores of the two tests. Timepoint: Pre-test in one day and final test immediately after the sessions (second and third day). Method of measurement: Comparison of the average score of the pre-test and the final test.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactHamidreza Mousavi

Semnan University of Medical Sciences

info@semums.ac.ir+98 23 3344 1022

Outcome results