Comparison of the effects of different behavioral guidance methods, intentional mistake distraction and conversation distraction, on the pain and anxiety of 4-7 year old children during dental treatment..
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention 1: Intervention group 1: Children are initially divided into two groups, both of which receive the intervention in a different order. Group 1: therapy session 1: intentional mistake distr
Sponsors
Arak University of Medical Sciences
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
4 Years to 7 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Children 4 to 7 years old Healthy children in terms of genetic, systemic and learning ability All children in need of pulpotomy and SSC treatment of maxillary first molar teeth bilaterally Children without any history of dentistry and hospitalization Children with a positive status (positive or definitely positive) according to Frankel's cooperation criterion
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Failure to accompany patients until the last stage of the study Children with decayed teeth in other parts of the mouth have a higher treatment priority than the treatment of maxillary first molars. The presence of severe pain or the necessity of treatment in one of the maxilla's first molars excludes the study from randomization. Changing the child's cooperation clearly during the treatment and leaving the positive or definitely positive cooperation situation.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Pulse rate. Timepoint: Three minutes after the child sits on the unit at the beginning of the treatment session and during the application of the behavioral guidance method during the injection of local anesthesia. Method of measurement: Pulse oximeter device: one of the symptoms of an anxiety state is an increase in heart rate, to check the level of anxiety, you can use the number of pulses per minute (Pulse rate/min), in this study, for this purpose, the digital electronic device 300 OXY (Microlife AG, Winadu, Switzerland) will be used by placing the probe of the device on the index finger of the child's left hand, and the score recorded in two sessions will be compared.;Face-Pain Rating. Timepoint: After applying local anesthesia. Method of measurement: Face Pain Rating (FPR) scale: This scale is used as a subjective criterion according to Table no.2 in the appendices to measure pain, which will be scored by the child himself using the attached picture, after applying local anesthesia, and the score determined is compared with the score of the next session.;Sound-eye-motor table. Timepoint: After the start of the certain behavioral guidance method, during the injection of anesthetic drug, according to the movements and situations related to the child's voice, eyes and body position, the corresponding score will be determined. Method of measurement: Table: Sound Eye Motor (SEM) This scale will be scored as an objective measure of pain according to Table No. 1 in the appendices, during the treatment sessions, after the start of a certain behavioral guidance method, during the injection of anesthetic drugs with attention The movements and situations related to the child's voice, eyes and body position will be assigned a score and recorded by a trained dental assistant (observer) of this criterion. will be compared. | — |
Countries
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Contacts
Public ContactSanaz Valipour Shokuhi
Arak University of Medical Sciences
Outcome results
None listed