Skip to content

Comparison of the effectiveness of Meichenbaum's stress inoculation training and Lazarus’ multimodal therapy on loneliness, psychological distress, resilience, and quality of life among the elderly

Comparison of the effectiveness of Meichenbaum's stress inoculation training and Lazarus’ multimodal therapy on loneliness, psychological distress, resilience, and quality of life among the elderly

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20240819062799N1
Enrollment
45
Registered
2024-09-07
Start date
2024-08-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Meichenbaum's method of stress inoculation training and Lazarus’ multimodal therapy on loneliness, psychological distress, resilience, and quality of life among the elderly.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Meichenbaum's stress inoculation training which covers the first group and consists of eight 60-minute sessions. Intervention 2: Lazarus’ multimodal therapy which covers the second gro

Sponsors

Islamic Azad University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
65 Years to 85 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Elderly people who are relatively healthy both physically and mentally People who have literacy skills sufficient for reading and writing People who are more than 65 up to 85

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: People who are suffering from acute physical and mental illnesses People who are illiterate People who are absent for more than one session

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The UCLA loneliness scale by Russell, Peplau, and Cutrona (1980). The sum of the participants’ scores forms the total score. A score of 20 indicates no feelings of loneliness. The maximum score is 80 and the average score is 50. Timepoint: The period in which loneliness is measured is before the beginning of the intervention and once again after 8 sessions of intervention. Method of measurement: The measuring method is UCLA questionnaire.;The psychological distress questionnaire of Kessler et al. (2002) is based on a 5-point Likert scale. Timepoint: The period in which psychological distress is measured is before the beginning of the intervention and once again after 8 sessions of intervention. Method of measurement: The measuring method is the psychological distress questionnaire of Kessler et al. (2002).;The Connor–Davidson resilience questionnaire (2003) which has a score range of 25 to 125. A higher score means a greater resilience. Timepoint: The period in which resilience is measured is before the beginning of the intervention and once again after 8 sessions of intervention. Method of measurement: The Connor–Davidson resilience questionnaire (2003).;The Persian version of the quality of life questionnaire (CASP-19) (2003) is a Likert-type questionnaire with four options. Timepoint: The period in which quality of life is measured is before the beginning of the intervention and once again after 8 sessions of intervention. Method of measurement: The measuring method is the Persian version of the quality of life questionnaire (CASP-19) (2003).

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactHossein Eghbali

Islamic Azad University

Eghbali.healthpsychologist@gmail.com+98 11 3530 2123

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026