The effect of peer with family-centered education on the quality of life and adherence to treatment

Comparison of the effectiveness of an educational-support program based on peer with family-centered education on the quality of life and adherence to treatment of kidney transplant patients

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20240818062796N1

Enrollment

Registered

2025-02-17

Start date

2024-12-19

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney transplants. Kidney transplant status

Interventions

Intervention 1: In the peer education group, first, to prepare the peer for patient education, the researcher will conduct 2 to 3 one-hour training sessions to update the peer's information according

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

20 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Not suffering from known physical and mental diseases that affect the quality of self-care, such as depression and schizophrenia, epilepsy and cancer (except diabetes and blood pressure), which require a special diet. Being literate in reading and writing Physical ability to participate in meetings

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Failure to attend more than one meeting People's participation in other educational programs Deterioration of the patient's condition (hospitalization in ICU) Death of the patient

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Madanlo treatment adherence questionnaire, which has 40 items, the range of scores varies from 0 to 200. A score of 75 to 100 percent means very good treatment adherence; (50 to 74) percentage points, meaning good treatment compliance; (26 to 49), mean mean treatment compliance score; and obtaining (zero to 25) points was considered as poor treatment compliance. Timepoint: Before and 6 weeks after the intervention. Method of measurement: Completing the questionnaire before the implementation of the intervention and six weeks after it and obtaining a score between 0-200.;Specific questionnaire of quality of life of kidney transplant patients (KTQ-25) includes five domains, and the total scores of each domain are 7 highest quality of life scores and one lowest score. Timepoint: Before and 6 weeks after the intervention. Method of measurement: Specific quality of life questionnaire for kidney transplant patients (KTQ-25), which has a total of 7 highest quality of life scores and one lowest score.	—

Measure

Time frame

Madanlo treatment adherence questionnaire, which has 40 items, the range of scores varies from 0 to 200. A score of 75 to 100 percent means very good treatment adherence; (50 to 74) percentage points, meaning good treatment compliance; (26 to 49), mean mean treatment compliance score; and obtaining (zero to 25) points was considered as poor treatment compliance. Timepoint: Before and 6 weeks after the intervention. Method of measurement: Completing the questionnaire before the implementation of the intervention and six weeks after it and obtaining a score between 0-200.;Specific questionnaire of quality of life of kidney transplant patients (KTQ-25) includes five domains, and the total scores of each domain are 7 highest quality of life scores and one lowest score. Timepoint: Before and 6 weeks after the intervention. Method of measurement: Specific quality of life questionnaire for kidney transplant patients (KTQ-25), which has a total of 7 highest quality of life scores and one lowest score.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactNeda Sanaie

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

nedasanaie@ymail.com+98 21 8865 5366

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026