Skip to content

Effects of Multi-modal Balance Training with and without Auditory cues on balance, Gait Mobility, Risk of Fall and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Sroke

Effects of Multi-modal Balance Training with and without Auditory cues on balance, Gait Mobility, Risk of Fall and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Sroke

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20240714062437N1
Enrollment
42
Registered
2024-11-15
Start date
2024-05-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke. Vascular syndromes of brain in cerebrovascular diseases

Interventions

in this study, patients are allocated into two groups. Both experimental groups received balance training
one intervention group received multi modal balance training exercises combined with auditory cues provided by a metronome (RAS-supported multimodal balance intervention), whereas the other interventi

Sponsors

The University of Lahore
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
45 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: both genders are included individuals with the age of between 45-70 years individuals with absent or less than grade 2 spasticity in modified ashworth scale in affected extremity indviduals having only one sided stroke individuals having score of less than 52 out of 56 in berg balnce scale

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: individuals who have any kind of cardiac disorder i.e. myocardial infarction etc individuals who have any orthopedic disorder i.e. arthritis etc indivduals who have any respiratory condition such as asthma etc. individuals who have non-healing ulcers individuals who have some visuospastial problems i.e. hemi-neglect etc

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Balance. Timepoint: 12 weeks. Method of measurement: The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is one of the most widely used tools for balance assessment. The BBS is a 14-item scale that quantitatively assesses balance and risk for falls in older community-dwelling adults through direct observation of their performance. The scale requires 10 to 20 minutes to complete and measures the patient’s ability to maintain balance—either statically or while performing various functional movements for a specified duration of time. The items are scored from 0 to 4, with a score of 0 representing an inability to complete the task and a score of 4 representing independent item completion. A global score is calculated out of 56 possible points. Scores of 0 to 20 represent balance impairment, 21 to 40 represent acceptable balance, and 41 to 56 represent good balance. The BBS measures both static and dynamic aspects of balance.;Gait mobility. Timepoint: 12 weeks. Method of measurement: The TUG test is a composite measure of functional mobility. The TUG was originallycreated to predict fall risk in geriatric patients. It includes executive function (listening andinitiating movements), transfer tasks (standing up and sitting down), walking, and balance.The TUG is performed by having the patient seated in a chair and with the command “go”,rise from the chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, return to chair and sit. The trial is timedfrom when the patient’s back leaves the backrest to when the patient returns to the seatedposition, and the patient is allowed one practice trial. TUG score of 13.5 seconds or morecould rule in the risk of a fall.;Risk of fall. Timepoint: 12 weeks. Method of measurement: The Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) is a measure of “fear of falling” or “concerns about falling”. The FES-I is intended to be used in adult population to measure the level of concern about falling during social and physical activities inside and outside the home whether or not the person actual

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Public ContactHammad Sattar

The University of Lahore

hammadsattarpt@gmail.com+92 344 7089190

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026