Comparing the effects of two different balance training protocols on improving balance in deaf female students

Investigation the effects of core stability training and child-centered play therapy on improving static and dynamic balance in female deaf children

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20240513061779N3

Enrollment

Registered

2025-12-30

Start date

2026-01-05

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Congenital bilateral deafness. Conductive hearing loss, bilateral

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: 8 weeks of performing full-body core stability training based on body weight with a frequency of 3 sessions per week (30 minutes in the first 3 weeks to 45 minutes

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Age

10 Years to 15 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Documented history of absolute or severe deafness Ability to walk independently No physical disabilities

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Outfit the prerequisitive age range of 10 to 15 years old Presence or emergence of other physical disabilities Adding drug treatments that interfere with the hormonal profile or performance of volunteers

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Error count in the functional test of standing with one foot on a hard surface. Timepoint: Before and 48 hours subsequent to the 8 weeks of balance training. Method of measurement: Field test of balance on a hard surface.;Error count in the functional test of standing with one foot on a soft surface. Timepoint: Before and 48 hours subsequent to the 8 weeks of balance training. Method of measurement: Field test of balance on a soft surface.;Error count in the functional test of tandem standing on a hard surface. Timepoint: Before and 48 hours subsequent to the 8 weeks of balance training. Method of measurement: Field test of balance on a hard surface.;Error count in the functional test of tandem standing on a soft surface. Timepoint: Before and 48 hours subsequent to the 8 weeks of balance training. Method of measurement: Field test of balance on a soft surface.;Functional test of Dynamic balance. Timepoint: Before and 48 hours after 8 weeks of balance training. Method of measurement: Field test 3 meters back and forth on a balance beam.	—

Measure

Time frame

Error count in the functional test of standing with one foot on a hard surface. Timepoint: Before and 48 hours subsequent to the 8 weeks of balance training. Method of measurement: Field test of balance on a hard surface.;Error count in the functional test of standing with one foot on a soft surface. Timepoint: Before and 48 hours subsequent to the 8 weeks of balance training. Method of measurement: Field test of balance on a soft surface.;Error count in the functional test of tandem standing on a hard surface. Timepoint: Before and 48 hours subsequent to the 8 weeks of balance training. Method of measurement: Field test of balance on a hard surface.;Error count in the functional test of tandem standing on a soft surface. Timepoint: Before and 48 hours subsequent to the 8 weeks of balance training. Method of measurement: Field test of balance on a soft surface.;Functional test of Dynamic balance. Timepoint: Before and 48 hours after 8 weeks of balance training. Method of measurement: Field test 3 meters back and forth on a balance beam.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactNader Hamedchaman

Shomal university

nader.hamedchaman@gmail.com+98 11 4420 3638

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026