Skip to content

The impact of mobile health intervention on the health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes

The impact of mobile health intervention based on Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model on the health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes : a randomized clinical study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20240504061643N1
Enrollment
90
Registered
2024-06-19
Start date
2024-05-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications

Interventions

Sponsors

Hamedan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Definitive diagnosis of type 2 diabetes during the last six months according to the opinion of an endocrinologist Having a smart mobile phone with the Android operating system and the ability to use it Having minimum literacy Being at least 18 years old Complete the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Acute psychiatric problems Acute musculoskeletal problems Suffering from severe medical complications of diabetes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Quality of life. Timepoint: Before and after the end of the intervention. Method of measurement: Using the summary of the World Health Organization quality of life questionnaire: The summary of the World Health Organization quality of life questionnaire includes 26 questions that evaluate the quality of life of patients in order to check the health status of patients and determine the health care results. The first two questions are designed to examine the overall quality of life and the individual's perception of the quality of life, and the following questions evaluate the four areas of physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and the physical environment of the individual. The scoring of the questionnaire is based on a five-point Likert scale, and each answer is assigned a score of 1-5 (not at all, low, medium, high, very high).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Physical activity. Timepoint: Before and after the end of the intervention. Method of measurement: Using the short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire: The short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire includes 7 questions in four parts: intense activity, moderate activity, walking and sitting activity during the last 7 days to check the level of compliance with physical activity. Using this tool, the intensity of physical activity can be calculated based on the quantitative measure of energy consumption and the qualitative measure of physical activity (favorable and unfavorable physical activity).;Self-efficacy. Timepoint: Before and after the end of the intervention. Method of measurement: Using the Diabetes Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: The self-efficacy questionnaire for diabetic patients was designed by the Stanford University Research Center to measure the self-efficacy of people with diabetes. This questionnaire contains 8 questions with a range of scores from 1 to 10 on a Likert scale, and the answers are classified as 1 (not sure at all) to 10 (completely sure). By calculating the total scores of 8 items, the self-efficacy score is obtained. In the whole range of scores between 8-80, higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAshkan Allahverdy Eznav

Hamedan University of Medical Sciences

ashkanallahverdy7900@gmail.com+98 81 3838 0535

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026