Skip to content

Efficacy of MASPORT in Blepharospasm

Comparing the efficacy of Toxin Botulinum type A with commercial names, MASPORT and DYSPORT in Benign Essential Blepharospasm: a Double blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20240216061023N1
Enrollment
19
Registered
2024-05-17
Start date
2024-02-25
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Essential Blepharospasm (BEB). Blepharospasm

Interventions

Intervention 1: Injection of Iranian product of Botulinom Toxin A with commercial name, MASPORT.[masoondarou.com] it contains 500 units of botulinum toxin A that is diluted by 3.2 CC sodium chloride

Sponsors

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Clinically diagnosed with BEB Without prior BTX-A injection in the previous 6 month History of previous eyelid surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: pregnancy or lactation secondary causes of Blepharospasm History of disorders of the neuromuscular junction like myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert Syndrome, and psychological instability prescription of antispastic, muscle relaxants or medications affecting neuromuscular junction transmission such as aminoglycosides

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Advance in the severity and frequency grades of spasms (more than at least one grade improvement in severity score. Timepoint: Four weeks post-injection phase. Method of measurement: Based on Severity and Frequency Spasm Score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in Functional Visual Status (FVS). Timepoint: 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks post-injection. Method of measurement: Functional Visual Status based on the Jankovic Rating Scale (JRS) and functional visual status (FVS) grading table.;Onset of response (denoting the period between the injection and the initial indication of improvement following treatment). Timepoint: 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks post-injection. Method of measurement: The time that the patient states that the symptoms of recovery have appeared.;The duration of effect (representing the time lapse between the first noticeable clinical impact and the point at which the patient sensed the necessity for further treatment and improvement from the patient perspective). Timepoint: 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks post-injection. Method of measurement: The period of time fom injection to the time that patient claim to observe improvement symptoms.;Need for retreatment (the point at which the ophthalmologist diagnosed that the patient needs for retreatment). Timepoint: 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks post-injection. Method of measurement: The period of time fom injection to the time that ophthalmologist consider reinjection for the patient.;Blepharospasm severity improvement (equal and more than one grade). Timepoint: 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks post-injection. Method of measurement: Based on the Severity of spasm grading table , Jankovic Rating Scale (JRS).;Blepharospasm frequency improvement ( equal and more than one grade). Timepoint: 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks post-injection. Method of measurement: Based on the Frequency of spasm grading table , Jankovic Rating Scale (JRS).

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactNazanin Behnaz

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

n.behnaz1990@gmail.com+98 21 2256 2138

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026