Effects of single-session and multi-session transcranial direct current stimulation

Effects of single-session and multi-session transcranial direct current stimulation on exective functions, eye-hand coordination and reaction time in novice tennis players

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20231219060468N1

Enrollment

Registered

2024-04-03

Start date

2024-04-08

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The participants are healthy and athletic people..

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Experimental group 1 (4 sessions of sham stimulation + 1 session of anodal stimulation). Intervention 2: Intervention group: Experimental group 2 (5 sessions of ano

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Male

Age

20 Years to 30 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The person must be a beginner and have less than 2 months of experience in tennis. observance with the age range of 20-30 years Right-handedness of people Having normal or corrected vision

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Having a history of neurological disorders or any disease that prevents entering the research process. Having any metal implants in the brain History of balance disorder and frequent positional vertigo Fear or dissatisfaction with electrical stimulation of the brain

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Eye-hand coordination. Timepoint: before and after the intervention and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: Automatic mirror drawing machine of Lafayette company.;Two-handed coordination. Timepoint: before and after the intervention and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: Lafayette company's two-handed coordination tool.;Selective reaction time. Timepoint: before and after the intervention and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: Selective reaction time measurement software.;Working memory. Timepoint: before and after the intervention and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: N-back software.;Selective attention. Timepoint: before and after the intervention and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: SIMPLE STROOP TEST.;Response inhibition. Timepoint: before and after the intervention and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: GO/NO-GO Test.;Cognitive flexibility. Timepoint: before and after the intervention and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: WISCONSIN CARD SORTING TEST.	—

Measure

Time frame

Eye-hand coordination. Timepoint: before and after the intervention and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: Automatic mirror drawing machine of Lafayette company.;Two-handed coordination. Timepoint: before and after the intervention and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: Lafayette company's two-handed coordination tool.;Selective reaction time. Timepoint: before and after the intervention and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: Selective reaction time measurement software.;Working memory. Timepoint: before and after the intervention and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: N-back software.;Selective attention. Timepoint: before and after the intervention and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: SIMPLE STROOP TEST.;Response inhibition. Timepoint: before and after the intervention and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: GO/NO-GO Test.;Cognitive flexibility. Timepoint: before and after the intervention and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: WISCONSIN CARD SORTING TEST.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAli Hirani

Razi University of Kermanshah

a.heirani@razi.ac.ir+98 918 889 9273

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026