Skip to content

Comparing the effect of Mulligan's mobilization and McKenzie's mobilization in people with referred neck pain

Investigation and comparison of spinal mobilization with arm movement in Mulligan's method and retraction mobilization with McKenzie's method on pain, electromyographic activity, kinetics and kinematics of the cervical spine in people with cervical radiculopathy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20231214060362N1
Enrollment
42
Registered
2024-01-09
Start date
2024-01-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Radiculopathy. Cervical disc disorder with radiculopathy

Interventions

Intervention group: Spinal Mobilization With Arm Movement In Mulligan Method.

Sponsors

Tarbiat Modares University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
31 Years to 55 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: History of neck pain with paraesthesia, numbness and weakness in one or both upper limbs in the last 6 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Osteoporosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain. Timepoint: Daily. Method of measurement: Visual Analogue Scale.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Rang Of Motion. Timepoint: before the start of the intervention and day 6 after the end of the intervention. Method of measurement: Motion analysis system.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactSomaye Shokri Khalife Mahale

Tarbiat Modares University

somayeshokrikhalife@gmail.com+98 21 8288 3590

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026