Skip to content

Gelfoamless tympanoplasty by the temporalis fascia and fibrin glue versus routine tympanoplasty and Gelfoam

Comparing the effectiveness of tympanoplasty with temporalis fascia and fibrin glue with the routine method of tympanoplasty with temporalis fascia and Gelfoam

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20231214060360N1
Enrollment
90
Registered
2023-12-25
Start date
2024-01-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Perforation of tympanic membrane. Perforation of tympanic membrane

Interventions

Intervention 1: Control group: In the control group, patients will undergo tympanoplasty surgery through the back of the ear using Gelfoam by the same surgeon as the intervention group. Intervention 2

Sponsors

Arak University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Partial tearing of the tympanic membrane Age 18 to 60 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Presence of cholesteatoma or other pathology

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Graft take rate. Timepoint: One week, one month and three months after surgery. Method of measurement: Tympanometry.;The average pure tone of the voice. Timepoint: Before surgery, one week, one month and three months after surgery. Method of measurement: Audiometry.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactSanam Asgari

Arak University of Medical Sciences

sanam.asgari1402@gmail.com+98 86 3313 6055

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026