Skip to content

Comparison of Two Educational Intervention Methods With Mobile Application vs. Face-to-Face Instruction on Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, Perceived Self-Efficacy, and Adherence with Pap Smear Testing among Women

Comparison of Two Educational Intervention Methods With Mobile Application vs. Face-to-Face Instruction on Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, Perceived Self-Efficacy, and Adherence with Pap Smear Testing among Women Aged 30-59

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20231130060228N1
Enrollment
120
Registered
2024-02-19
Start date
2024-02-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Cancer. Malignant neoplasm of cervix uteri, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: The first group of the intervention will be in such a way that at first the participants will be members of the ITA group. After welcoming and introducing himself,
Then the time and place of the first training session was announced in the groupThe schedule of training sessions will be in person one day a week. These sessions include 2 training sessions to increa

Sponsors

Tarbiat Modares University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
30 Years to 59 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. A resident of Saveh city Covered by the centers and has an active electronic file of the Sib system Age between 30 and 59 years Having marriage experience More than 3 years have passed since the first sex Obtaining a weak and average knowledge score in the first stage of study Using a smart mobile phone to use virtual networks (ITA) Desire to participate in research

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Participation in another educational program at the same time or parallel to the intervention Being pregnant now Perform hysterectomy Genital warts or cervical cancer known and under treatment Conducting a pap smear test in the last 2 years Conducting HPV screening tests in the last 10 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Knowledge score in the Farsi version of cervical cancer screening self-efficacy questionnaire. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately, one month later and three months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Persian version of cervical cancer screening self-efficacy questionnaire.;Attitude score in the Persian version of cervical cancer screening self-efficacy questionnaire. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately, one month later and three months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Persian version of cervical cancer screening self-efficacy questionnaire.;Self-efficacy score in the Farsi version of cervical cancer screening self-efficacy scale. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately, one month later and three months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Persian version of cervical cancer screening self-efficacy questionnaire.;Practice score in the Farsi version of cervical cancer screening self-efficacy questionnaire. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately, one month later and three months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Persian version of cervical cancer screening self-efficacy questionnaire.;Adhereance to action score in Persian version of the Adhereance to action pap smear. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately, one month later and three months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Persian version of the Adhereance to action pap smear.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactFatemeh Zarei

Tarbiat Modares University

f.zarei@modares.ac.ir+98 21 8288 4546

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026