Skip to content

Comparisons of transcranial direct current and transcranial pulsed current motion on anaerobic performance and neurophysiological responses.

Comparison of the effects of transcranial direct current and transcranial pulsatile current stimulation on anaerobic performance and neurophysiological responses in basketball girls

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20231126060186N1
Enrollment
15
Registered
2023-12-20
Start date
2023-12-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Participants are healthy and trained basketball players..

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Intervention group: In this study, all the subjects were exposed to two intervention conditions with an interval of one week, including 1) direct electrical stimula

Sponsors

Razi University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 30 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Basketball girls with at least two years of experience in club sports in the field of basketball age range 18 to 30 years resident of Kermanshah city body mass index 18.5 to 24.9 weight per square meter certificate of non-prohibition of participation in sports training program from a doctor.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Suffering from various chronic cardiovascular, pulmonary and metabolic diseases History of seizures, epilepsy or other types of neurological diseases Abnormalities or musculoskeletal disorders Smoking and alcohol consumption

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Peak anaerobic power. Timepoint: During the anaerobic test. Method of measurement: Monarch wheel (Monark ergomedic 894E).;Average anaerobic power. Timepoint: During the anaerobic test. Method of measurement: Monarch wheel (Monark ergomedic 894E).;Fatigue index. Timepoint: During the anaerobic test. Method of measurement: Monarch wheel (Monark ergomedic 894E).;Rating of perceived exertion. Timepoint: During the performance of the anaerobic test, during the active recovery period after the performance of the anaerobic test. Method of measurement: Using a pressure perception scale of 6 to 20 borg.;Amplitude of muscle electromyography. Timepoint: During the performance of the anaerobic test. Method of measurement: 16-channel wireless electromyography device (Noraxon model, Scottsdale, AZ85260).;Feeling pain. Timepoint: During the performance of the anaerobic test, during the active recovery period after the performance of the anaerobic test. Method of measurement: Using a scale of 0 to 10.;Heart beat. Timepoint: During the performance of the anaerobic test, during the active recovery period after the performance of the anaerobic test. Method of measurement: Monarch wheel (Monark ergomedic 894E).;Sense of pleasure. Timepoint: During the performance of the anaerobic test, during the active recovery period after the performance of the anaerobic test. Method of measurement: Using an 11-item emotion scale.;Arousal level. Timepoint: During the performance of the anaerobic test, during the active recovery period after the performance of the anaerobic test. Method of measurement: Using a 6-item scale of perceived arousal.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactVahid Tadibi

Razi University

vtadibi@yahoo.com+98 83 3427 9265

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026