Skip to content

Selecting Appropriate LMA

Comparison of weight methods and anthropometric measurement of Hyocricoid Distance in predicting the appropriate size of Laryngeal Mask Airway in patients airway management

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20231022059807N1
Enrollment
100
Registered
2023-11-13
Start date
2023-11-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sore throat caused by LMA insertion. Other complications of anaesthesia

Interventions

Intervention 1: Control group: selection of LMA size based on weight. Intervention 2: Intervention group: selection of LMA size based on HCD.

Sponsors

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients under general anesthesia by LMA Age above 18 years Absence of contraindications for LMA insertion ASA Class I-II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Lack of consent to enter the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of the effect of LMA size selection based on HCD with the standard method (based on weight) on the success rate of positive pressure ventilation. Timepoint: Measurement of airway pressure and the shape of the respiratory return curve after LMA implantation. Method of measurement: Fabius model anesthesia machine.;The rate of complications of LMA implantation. Timepoint: Immediately after anesthesia and two hours after anesthesia. Method of measurement: Questionnaire and interview.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactArdeshir Tajbakhsh

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

ardeshir.tajbakhsh@gmail.com+98 21 7343 0000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026