Gingival recession. Other disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention 1: Intervention group: Patients receiving matrix collagen: Xenogenic collagen matrix has been proposed as a possible alternative to soft tissue grafting to increase KT band around teeth a
Sponsors
Babol University of Medical Sciences
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: At least 18 years old Patients with general health Presence of one or more Miller class I bilateral Gingival recession in canine and premolar teeth (minimum 2 and maximum 3 teeth) Having a minimum gingival recession of =3 mm Visible Cemento-enamel junction The selected teeth should be without buccal filling and without bleeding after probing. The ability to maintain proper dental hygiene At least 1 mm of apical keratinized tissue Has a cosmetic problem or dentine sensitivity
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy and breastfeeding Smoking Tooth with root decay Cervical lesions or cervical restoration Extruded, rotated and proclined teeth History of surgery Suffering from a systemic disease Use of corticosteroids and anticancer drugs Use of drugs affecting periodontal tissue Known allergy to drugs used in surgery Active infectious disease (hepatitis, tuberculosis and AIDS) Use of movable prosthesis in the desired area Use of movable prosthesis in the desired area
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Increase the percentage of root coverage. Timepoint: 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery. Method of measurement: The percentage of root coverage will be calculated based on the following formula: the vertical depth of gingival rcession before surgery minus the vertical depth of gingival recession after surgery divided by the vertical depth of gingival recssion before surgery multiplied by 100. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Decreased dentine sensitivity. Timepoint: 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery. Method of measurement: Dentin sensitivity will be evaluated by the patient using the visual pain scale (VAS) after stimulating the buccal surface of the restored teeth for 1 second at a distance of about 1 cm by separating the cotton roll. | — |
Countries
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Contacts
Public ContactMehrdad Qolipour Khatir
Babol University of Medical Sciences
Outcome results
None listed