Skip to content

Fractional Carbon dioxide LASER with Topical Methotrexate Vs Topical PUVASOL in Treatment of Vitiligo

Effectiveness Of Fractional Carbon dioxide LASER with Topical Methotrexate Vs Topical PUVASOL in Treatment of Vitiligo-RCT

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20230816059168N2
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-03-03
Start date
2024-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vitiligo. Vitiligo

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group1: Fractional Carbon dioxide laser followed by topical methotrexate. Topical eutectic mixture of local anesthetic cream will be applied over the patient’s lesions for
a resurfacing mode, pulse energy of 70–100 J/cm2, coverage and a spot density of 150 spots/cm2 (static mode). After each session topical 25mg/ml methotrexate injection, not more than 0.3 ml will be ma

Sponsors

National University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
10 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients willing to participate in the study Patients of age group 10 -70 years. Vitiligo involving less than or equal to 10% body surface area.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients using or have used other treatments for vitiligo in the recent past Pregnant women or lactating women Patients with segmental vitiligo Patients on immunosuppressant medications due to other diseases Patients having connective tissue diseases, epilepsy or photosensitivity disorders Patient having previous radiotherapy or phototherapy. Patients with personal or family history of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers Patients having contraindications to methotrexate or PUVASOL therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical improvement. Timepoint: At the end of 1st and 2nd month. Method of measurement: A blinded independent medical observer will perform clinical assessments using the following grading scale for all 30 patients: 1, 75% excellent re-pigmentation.;Patient satisfaction. Timepoint: At the end of 1st and 2nd month. Method of measurement: Patient satisfaction will also be assessed by grading scale i.e. 1. Unsatisfied, 2. Partially satisfied, 3. Completely satisfied.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Public ContactSakina Sadiq Malik

NUMS-Pakistan

dazzlingdocsak2078@hotmail.com+92 321 5108737

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026