Comparison of two methods of LMA insertion,Classic method and using a Laryngoscope..
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention 1: Control group: Placing the LMA mask in the classic way: In this method, the LMA mask is inserted into the patient s mouth by the doctor's index finger, and then it is sent to the patie
Sponsors
Khoram-Abad University of Medical Sciences
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Elective surgery patients in Khorramabad Ashayer Hospital ,in 1402, Patients with ASA class 1 and 2. Patients with minor surgery. Patients aged 18 to 65 years Informed patients with written consent
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Patients with head and face injuries and head and neck abnormalities Patients who have contraindications for LMA placement: such as high risk of aspiration, not fasting, pregnancy Patients with difficult Airway
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Number of attempts to successfully insert LMA. Timepoint: After LMA placement. Method of measurement: Observe.;Duration of placement of LMA. Timepoint: After LMA placement. Method of measurement: Observe.;Presence of blood on the LMA. Timepoint: After removing the LMA. Method of measurement: Observe.;Presence of air in the stomach. Timepoint: After removing the LMA. Method of measurement: Abdominal examination.;Severity of sore throat after surgery based on the VAS criterion. Timepoint: After the surgery is completed and the patient becomes conscious. Method of measurement: interview.;Tooth damage. Timepoint: After LMA placement. Method of measurement: Observe.;Doctor's satisfaction rate. Timepoint: After LMA placement. Method of measurement: Interview. | — |
Countries
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Contacts
Public ContactAram Azizi
Khoram-Abad University of Medical Sciences
Outcome results
None listed