Skip to content

The effect of bone grafting method and the material on bone formation

comparison of the amount of bone structure by the GBR double-layer technique at the same time as placing the implant in the cosmetic area using FDBA and DFDBA

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20230708058713N1
Enrollment
80
Registered
2023-09-05
Start date
2023-04-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

3 to 4 mm narrow ridge with a 4-wall defect in the buccal two-thirds of the cosmetic area.

Interventions

Antibiotic prophylaxis is given before the procedure
Intervention 1: This study has two intervention groups as follows: the samples will be randomly divided into two groups of 40. In the first group, the implant intervention is performed at the same tim
Lidocaine infiltration anesthesia is used and the full thickness mucoperiosteal flap is performed without damaging the periosteum. The incision is made at the apex of the ridge while maintaining a suf
In the third layer, 0.3 cc DFDBA allograft with 500-1000 nm particles from Ceno Bone brand is placed, and finally intact periosteum is placed as the fourth layer. Intervention 2: Intervention group:In

Sponsors

Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
30 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients have ASA = 1 They have extracted their teeth in front of the maxilla and referred after soft tissue healing. Patients have a narrow ridge of 3 to 4 mm in the aesthetic zone. The primary stability of used implants is above 35. The age of the patients is 30 to 60 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The patient does not have ideal systemic conditions (ASA should not be 1) The patient is over 60 years old.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of bone formation; Consistency of results. Timepoint: 6 months follow up. Method of measurement: The area filled in the cavity created in the bone using the comparison of two CBCTs at the beginning of the operation and 6 months follow-up.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactRaofe Asghari

Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Asghari.raha@yahoo.com+98 21 2280 2041

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026