Skip to content

COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF HAND ARM BIMANUAL INTENSIVE TRAINING (HABIT) AND PROPRIOCEPTIVE NEUROMUSCULAR FACILITATION (PNF) PATTERNS ON UPPER EXTREMITY DYSFUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH SUBACUTE STROKE

COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF HAND ARM BIMANUAL INTENSIVE TRAINING (HABIT) AND PROPRIOCEPTIVE NEUROMUSCULAR FACILITATION (PNF) PATTERNS ON UPPER EXTREMITY DYSFUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH SUBACUTE STROKE

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20230526058301N1
Enrollment
46
Registered
2023-09-11
Start date
2023-07-24
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke. Subacute stroke

Interventions

Sponsors

The University of Faisalabad
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
35 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Stroke patient clinically diagnosed or with scan of CT computed tomography or MRI magnetic resonance imaging Sub-acute stroke patients Age 35–60?years Patient with GCS score >8 and vitally stable On Mini-Mental State Exam score must be >24 and having no severe cognitive problems Patients suffered from first time stroke and able to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with severe cardiopulmonary complications Any intracranial implant Patient with pacemaker Any kind of cranial defect Patients with worsening condition that causes difficulties for physiotherapy treatment All the medical conditions except stroke that limited the use of upper limb Patients with epilepsy Patients having previous history of stroke on same side that diminish upper extremity function

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Spasticity. Timepoint: At baseline, after second week of intervention, after fourth week of intervention, after sixth week of intervention and after eight week of intervention. Method of measurement: Modified Ashworth Scale.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Motor Function of upper limb. Timepoint: At baseline, after second week of intervention, after fourth week of intervention, after sixth week of intervention and after eight week of intervention. Method of measurement: Fugl-Meyer assessment scale for Upper Extremity.;Activities of daily living and motor function of upper limb. Timepoint: At baseline, after second week of intervention, after fourth week of intervention, after sixth week of intervention and after eight week of intervention. Method of measurement: Motor activity log-28 scores.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Public ContactAyesha Affi

The University of Faisalabad

2021-ms-pt-066@tuf.edu.pk+92 41 8868326

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026