Skip to content

Comparative effects of Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique and Active Release Technique on Pain, Range of Motion, and Neck Disability in Patients with Upper Trapezius Myofascial Trigger Points; A Randomized Clinical Trial

Comparative effects of Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique and Active Release Technique on Pain, Range of Motion, and Neck Disability in Patients with Upper Trapezius Myofascial Trigger Points; A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20230524058279N1
Enrollment
44
Registered
2023-06-08
Start date
2023-05-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Latent myofascial trigger points causing neck pain for 3 months or more. soft tissue disorders, use, overuse, pressure

Interventions

this group will receive 'Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique' which will target upper trapezius trigger points to improve neck pain, range of motion and neck disability. The intervention wil
This group will receive ten repetitions of 'Active Release Technique' which will target upper trapezius latent trigger points to improve neck pain, range of motion and neck disability. The interventio

Sponsors

Riphah International University Faisalabad Campus
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 35 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participants aged between 20 to 35 years. Work/Sedentary activity of 5 hours per day. Minimum of 4 months of neck pain due to trigger points. Decreased cervical lateral flexion and rotation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of whiplash injury, fracture or other congenital disorders. Cervical radiculopathy, radiculitis or myelopathy or vascular syndromes. Degenerative conditions of cervical spine e.g. spondylosis Any deformity of cervical and thoracic spine or scapular deformity. Participant received any treatment of neck in past 3 months. VAS score >7

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cervical Pain. Timepoint: Baseline reading before intervention, post reading was taken after 2 weeks and Follow up reading was measured 4 weeks after intervention. Method of measurement: Cervical pain of each individual was measured by using Visual analogue scale (VAS).;Cervical range of motion - Side bending and Lateral rotation. Timepoint: Baseline reading before intervention, post reading was taken after 2 weeks and Follow up reading was measured 4 weeks after intervention. Method of measurement: Cervical range of motion of side bending and rotation was measured using a Goniometer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Neck disability. Timepoint: Baseline reading before intervention, post reading was taken after 2 weeks and Follow up reading was measured 4 weeks after intervention. Method of measurement: Neck disability of each individual was calculated using Neck Disability Index (NDI).

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Public ContactRida E Fatima

Riphah International University Faisalabad Campus

ridaefatima234@gmail.com+92 321 6002890

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026