Skip to content

COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF GASTROCNEMIUS MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE AND STRAIN COUNTERSTRAIN ON GAIT OF FAST BOWLERS WITH GASTROCNEMIUS TRIGGER POINTS

COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF GASTROCNEMIUS MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE AND STRAIN COUNTERSTRAIN ON GAIT OF FAST BOWLERS WITH GASTROCNEMIUS TRIGGER POINTS

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20230427058011N1
Enrollment
42
Registered
2023-09-26
Start date
2023-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Condition 1: GASTROCNEMIUS TRIGGER POINTS. Condition 2: GAIT IN GASTROCNEMIUS TRIGGER POINTS. Unspecified soft tissue disorder related to use, overuse and pressure of unspecified site Difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group A Muscle Energy Technique (MET): Group A subject received 10 minutes session of moist hot pack from hydro collator at 55 degrees followed by a set of 7 repetitions o

Sponsors

The University of Faisalabad
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male
Age
20 Years to 30 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Fast bowlers willing to participate in the age group of 20-30 years Fast bowlers having at least one hypersensitive tender nodule within a palpable taut band in the gastrocnemius muscle Fast bowlers having ankle dorsiflexion range of motion less than 20 degrees Pain intensity of more than 4 on numeric pain rating scale Subjects running for 3 days per week for more than 6-months will be recruited

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Participants having Fibromyalgia syndrome Congenital deformity of the foot and ankle Tumors of the lower back and lower limb Lower limb fractures Diabetic neuropathy Peripheral vascular disease 3-month recent injuries to legs, foot or ankle will be excluded from the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain. Timepoint: Before intervention, after 2nd week of intervention and after 4th week of intervention. Method of measurement: Pain was measured using NPRS (numerical pain rating scale).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Cadence. Timepoint: Before intervention, after 2nd week of intervention and after 4th week of intervention. Method of measurement: Measured by using stop watch and measuring tape.;Stride length. Timepoint: Before intervention, after 2nd week of intervention and after 4th week of intervention. Method of measurement: Measured by using stop watch and measuring tape.;Ankle dorsiflexion/plantarflexion. Timepoint: Before intervention, after 2nd week of intervention and after 4th week of intervention. Method of measurement: Using goniometer.;Sprinting and Function. Timepoint: Before intervention, after 2nd week of intervention and after 4th week of intervention. Method of measurement: LEFS (lower extremity functional scale).

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Public ContactMohsin Ali

The University of Faisalabad

dr.m.mohsinali.pt@gmail.com+92 307 7140056

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026