A comparative study of three open ,semi-closed, and closed surgical methods in the treatment of pilonidal sinus

A comparative study of three open ,semi-closed, and closed surgical methods in the treatment of pilonidal sinus in terms of recovery time, side effects, and costs in the: A clinical trial double blined.

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20230409057866N1

Enrollment

105

Registered

2023-04-27

Start date

2023-04-12

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pilonidal sinus.

Interventions

Intervention group: In this study, in patients who are candidates for pilonidal sinus surgery, the intervention will be in the form of 3 methods: 1- leaving the wound open, 2- bringing the layers of t

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Candidate for pilonidal sinus surgery No history of pilonidal sinus surgery Not having diabetes and malignancy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The patient's unwillingness to cooperate The patient's inability to communicate

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Recovery time, pain, bleeding, infection, costs. Timepoint: during the intervention until one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: McGill questionnaire, Likert scale.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public Contactdr.behzad imani

Hamedan University of Medical Sciences

Behzadiman@yahoo.com+98 81 3131 0000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026