Skip to content

Comparison of gastric fundus mucosal ablation combined with intragastric botulinum toxin injection versus intragastric botulinum toxin injection alone on weight loss in individuals with obesity

Comparing the effect of hybrid gastric fundus mucosal ablation (GFMA) combined with intragastric botulinum toxin injection versus intragastric botulinum toxin injection alone on weight loss in individuals with obesity.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20230314057717N5
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-05-17
Start date
2026-05-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity. Overweight and obesity

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Gastric fundus mucosal ablation using Hybrid Argon Plasma Coagulation after submucosal injection of saline mixed with methylene blue to create a protective cushion,

Sponsors

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Body mass index (BMI) greater than 27 kg/m² Willingness and ability to provide informed consent Willingness to adhere to follow-up schedule and dietary recommendations No history of previous bariatric surgery or major upper gastrointestinal surgery Eligibility for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and sedation No contraindication to botulinum toxin injection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Known allergy to botulinum toxin or its components Pregnancy or lactation Neuromuscular disorders such as myasthenia gravis or multiple sclerosis Liver cirrhosis or esophageal or gastric varices Pathological findings on baseline endoscopy such as ulcers or malignancy Eating disorders such as bulimia or anorexia Severe cardiovascular or pulmonary disease History of alcohol or substance abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Body mass index. Timepoint: at baseline (before intervention) and 3 months after intervention. Method of measurement: Body mass index calculated based on weight measured by a standard scale and height measured by a stadiometer and calculated as weight divided by height squared in kilograms per square meter.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Waist circumference. Timepoint: Before intervention and 3 months after intervention. Method of measurement: Measured with a tape measure in the mid-region between the last rib and the iliac crest.;Hip circumference. Timepoint: Before intervention and 3 months after intervention. Method of measurement: Measured with a tape measure at the most prominent part of the buttocks.;Arm circumference. Timepoint: Before intervention and 3 months after intervention. Method of measurement: Measurement with a tape measure at the mid-arm.;Blood lipid profile. Timepoint: Before intervention and 3 months after intervention. Method of measurement: Measured by fasting blood test in the laboratory.;Blood sugar. Timepoint: Before intervention and 3 months after intervention. Method of measurement: Measured by fasting blood test in the laboratory.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactSaeed Lotfi

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

saeed.lotfi.1988@gmail.com+98 21 2243 2526

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026