Comparison of two methods of mandibular osteotomy

Comparison of two methods of medial ramus osteotomy in sagittal split osteotomy ((standard method and parallel osteotomy))for easiness and post operation complication

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20230313057709N1

Enrollment

Registered

2023-06-18

Start date

2023-06-15

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

patients with skeletal deformity. Anomalies of jaw-cranial base relationship

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: medial paralel osteotomy. Intervention 2: Control group: sagital split osteotomy.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

16 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with skeletal class 2&3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients that need genioplasty Patients with mandibular nerve abnormalities

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Chin and lower lip anesthesia after the surgery. Timepoint: Before and after the surgery. Method of measurement: Two point discrimination.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMohamad Hasan Samandari

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences

samandari@dnt.mui.ac.ir+98 31 3620 2020

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026