Skip to content

Comparison of the clinical results of the use of two spinal epidural methods and epidural puncture epidural in the process of natural childbirth analgesia

Comparison of the clinical results of the use of two spinal epidural methods and epidural puncture epidural in the process of natural childbirth analgesia - a randomized clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20230310057671N1
Enrollment
98
Registered
2023-04-16
Start date
2023-05-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pregnant women giving birth naturally.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Control group: In a group, combined spinal epidural analgesia (CSE) is performed in the following way: CSE is performed in stage I, in the first step, spinal analgesia is performed, in

Sponsors

Karaj University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 45 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 37 weeks to 40 weeks pregnant women in normal labor vertex position

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Non-vortex position Pregnant women's inability to maintain immobility during work (for example, Parkinson's disease) Coagulation disorders and homeostasis defects Increased intracranial pressure for any reason (space-occupying lesions) Local infection of the injection site and bacteremia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Paresthesia. Timepoint: 0 minutes, 60 minutes, 12 hours, 24 hours. Method of measurement: paresthesia ? (After the analgesia intervention, it is only important for us whether the person experiences paresthesia at the mentioned times or not, the amount of paresthesia that is low or high has no value for us in this study, for this reason, the person is only asked that Does it have paresthesia or not?.;Urinary retention. Timepoint: 12 hours, 24 hours. Method of measurement: Ask the person ? (After the analgesia intervention, it is only important for us if the person has urinary retention at the mentioned times or not, the amount of urinary retention that is low or high has no value for us in this study, that is why we only ask the person whether he has urinary retention or not).;Bishop Score. Timepoint: 0 min (immediately after the analgesia intervention). Method of measurement: Bishop's score is determined by examining five characteristics: dilatation, effacement, descent, location of the cervix and consistency of the cervix based on the scoring system of the Bishop Score table. The scoring is calculated and recorded by the researcher in the laber.;Length of the second stage of labor. Timepoint: Starting from the complete dilatation of the cervix and continuing until the delivery of the baby, the analgesia intervention is performed before the complete dilatation of the cervix. Method of measurement: We take time with the clock.;The amount of pain during childbirth is independent. Timepoint: 0-5-10-15-20-30-45-60-90-120 min. Method of measurement: The intensity of the patient's pain during labor is measured by the numerical rating pain scale.;Type of delivery (natural without tools / natural with the help of tools (vacuum) / ending in caesarean section). Timepoint: Time of delivery. Method of measurement: Description of the operation by the surgeon.;Headache. Timepoint: 0 minutes, 12 hours, 24 hours. Method of measurement: Ask the person ? (After the analgesia interven

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMohammad Hossein Delshad

Karaj University of Medical Sciences

info@maryamhospital.ir+98 26 3350 2347

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026