Comparison of the effectiveness mindfulness-based strengths practice MBSP and cognitive behavioral training

Comparison of the effectiveness mindfulness-based strengths practice MBSP and cognitive behavioral training on psychological well-being, life satisfaction, future anxiety and perceived stress in gifted students

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20230306057632N1

Enrollment

Registered

2023-05-13

Start date

2023-02-19

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Condition 1: Psychological well-being. Condition 2: The level of satisfaction with life. Condition 3: Future anxiety and dark anxiety. Condition 4: Stress. Mental and behavioural disorders Behavioural and emotional disorders with onset usually occurring in childhood and adolescence F30-F39 Mood [affective] disorders Neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Experimental group 1 who are trained to practice strengths based on mindfulness. Intervention 2: Intervention group: experimental group 2 who are subjected to cogn

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Age

13 Years to 18 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Low score in the psychological well-being questionnaire Students have physical symptoms (headache, nausea, discomfort and pain in the chest and abdomen, palpitations, sweating, weakness) Desire and informed consent Having physical health to the extent of participating in class and taking the test through a psychological interview

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Absence of more than 2 sessions in the training course Children of divorce Completing incomplete and invalid questionnaires

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Life satisfaction score in Diner's questionnaire. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study and 8 weeks later and 45 days later. Method of measurement: Diener's Life Satisfaction Questionnaire.;Psychological well-being score in Ryff's questionnaire. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study and 8 weeks later and 45 days later. Method of measurement: Ryff psychological well-being questionnaire.;Dark anxiety score in Zaleski, Sobol-Kwapinska questionnaire. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study and 8 weeks later and 45 days later. Method of measurement: Zaleski, Sobol-Kwapinska, Przepiorka & Meisner dark anxiety questionnaire.;Perceived stress score in Cohen's questionnaire. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study and 8 weeks later and 45 days later. Method of measurement: Cohen's Perceived Stress Questionnaire.	—

Measure

Time frame

Life satisfaction score in Diner's questionnaire. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study and 8 weeks later and 45 days later. Method of measurement: Diener's Life Satisfaction Questionnaire.;Psychological well-being score in Ryff's questionnaire. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study and 8 weeks later and 45 days later. Method of measurement: Ryff psychological well-being questionnaire.;Dark anxiety score in Zaleski, Sobol-Kwapinska questionnaire. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study and 8 weeks later and 45 days later. Method of measurement: Zaleski, Sobol-Kwapinska, Przepiorka & Meisner dark anxiety questionnaire.;Perceived stress score in Cohen's questionnaire. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study and 8 weeks later and 45 days later. Method of measurement: Cohen's Perceived Stress Questionnaire.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactFatemeh Kamran

Islamic Azad University

dabir_kamran@yahoo.com+98 11 5465 9551

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026