Multiple Sclerosis. Multiple sclerosis
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Definitive diagnosis based on neurological examinations and magnetic resonance imaging by a specialist doctor Not suffering from other neurological and chronic diseases at the same time Absence of mild cognitive problems by short mental state test Absence of severe psychological disorders Membership in the Multiple Sclerosis Association Age range from 26 to 44 years Literacy for reading and writing
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Suffering from other neurological and chronic diseases Suffering from severe psychological disorders at the same time Having cognitive problems Taking psychiatric and psychoactive drugs No membership in the Multiple Sclerosis Association Age less than 26 and more than 44 years Lack of literacy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Self-management is a score that the subject receives through the self-management scale of MS patients (revised) by Bishop and Frain (2011). This self-report tool is compiled in 24 items and 5 subscales. The higher the person's score, the higher the level of self-management. The range of changes in this tool is between 24 and 120. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study, that is, before the intervention in the form of a pre-test and after the intervention in the form of a post-test and then in the follow-up. Method of measurement: The Multiple Sclerosis Self-Management Scale–Revised (MSSM-R).;Difficulty in emotion regulation is the score that the subject receives through the difficulty of emotion regulation scale by Gratz and Roemer (2004). This self-report tool has 36 items and 6 subscales. Higher scores mean more difficulty in emotional regulation. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study, that is, before the intervention in the form of a pre-test and after the intervention in the form of a post-test and then in the follow-up. Method of measurement: Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale.;Acceptance of pain is the score that the subject receives from the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire - Revised by McCracken et al. (2004). The questionnaire has 20 items and two factors of participation in activity and desire for pain have been identified in this questionnaire. To obtain a total score, we add the scores of each factor together. Higher scores indicate higher levels of acceptance. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study, that is, before the intervention in the form of a pre-test and after the intervention in the form of a post-test and then in the follow-up. Method of measurement: Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire - Revised.;Pain catastrophizing is a score that the subject receives through the pain catastrophizing scale of Sullivan et al. (1995). This questionnaire contains 13 statements about the person's thoughts and feelings during past painful exper | — |
Countries
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Contacts
Islamic Azad University