Skip to content

Comparison of 2 methods of gingival connective tissue grafting in terms of patient comfort and grafted tissue quality

Comparison morbidity in donor site and color matching in recipient site between two different free connective tissue graft harvesting technique from palate

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20230102057017N1
Enrollment
12
Registered
2023-01-30
Start date
2023-01-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival recession.

Interventions

Intervention group: The group in which graft harvested from the palate in an epithelialized form.

Sponsors

Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Bilateral areas in the jaw where the teeth have gingival recession. If the number of teeth affected by recession on both sides of the jaw is not the same, the area with a smaller size is the criterion, and the same number of teeth is considered on the opposite side of the surgical site The bilateral areas affected by the analysis should have approximately the same recession depth There should not be CAL interdental soft tissue in the areas with recession (Miller 1 and 2) The presence of a sulcus with a depth < 3 mm The thickness of the palate in people should be at least 2 mm Absence of signs of inflammation in the teeth located in the area of ??gum augmentation (such as BOP, enlargement, pus) or if there is, performing periodontal treatment and controlling the symptoms People over 18 years old There is no history of graft harvesting from palate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Smokers who smoke more than 10 cigarettes per day Pregnant women People who take drugs that affect periodontal tissues and healing of tissues Teeth in the surgical area with mobility or improper root treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluation the pain level of the patient in the donor area which is measured based on the Visual Analogue Scale. Timepoint: The third and seventh day after surgery. Method of measurement: Visual Analogue Score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Graft shrinkage in recipient site. Timepoint: 6 months after surgery. Method of measurement: The ratio of the grafted area in recipient site to the initial area of the graft before suturing, which is measured by Image J software.;Evaluating the degree of color matching in the recipient area. Timepoint: 6 months after surgery. Method of measurement: The score of 3 blind professor regarding the method used and averaging them.;Evaluating the thickness of grafted site. Timepoint: 6 months after surgery. Method of measurement: Ultrasonography.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAmine Beymouri

Tehran University of Medical Sciences

aminebeymouri@gmail.com+98 21 4279 4000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026